Fortunately, EFF's Parker Higgins has come up with an explanation of the oral argument: In the form of a parody of Lewis Carroll's "Jabberwocky." Now it almost makes sense. Almost.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
"Jabberwocky" Parody Featuring Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank
One of my most recent EFF amicus briefs was in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l. The case deals with the patentability of computer software and business methods. The Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case on Monday, March 31. While the transcript makes it seem likely that Alice Corp. will lose its patents, it's unclear whether the Court will make a broad ruling either upholding or limiting software patents.
Fortunately, EFF's Parker Higgins has come up with an explanation of the oral argument: In the form of a parody of Lewis Carroll's "Jabberwocky." Now it almost makes sense. Almost.
Fortunately, EFF's Parker Higgins has come up with an explanation of the oral argument: In the form of a parody of Lewis Carroll's "Jabberwocky." Now it almost makes sense. Almost.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment